Aphex aural exciter vs bbe sonic maximizer. Hello !Up for sale is an amazing effects unit.
Aphex aural exciter vs bbe sonic maximizer. $114. When I heard the BBE plug the first time I was a bit surprised, because I though that it was something more like the Aphex aural exiter, that I worked a lot with in a recording studio back in the 80:s. Owned the Sonic Stomp, and while it seemed to fatten up my sound, it added a digital 'edge' and it killed the natural dynamics of the guitar. John Pickford explains why… Aphex appeared on the recording scene in 1975 with the first incarnation of the Aural Exciter. Dec 13, 2012 · I bought a brand new BBE model 462 off of Ebay for $39 after reading this thread. Experience the magic of the 882 Sonic Maximizer from BBE! BBE 882i Sonic Maximizer features: Mar 11, 2024 · Hi ! I have a BBE Max X3 , stereo crossover with BBE sonic maximizer and I LOVE IT !! I made a diy Bose L1 array system and used it for the satellites and bass modules It made such a big difference, especially with the high frequency horn tweeter switch engaged I turned it on the other day , and smelled burning electronics Aug 17, 2018 · The Lo Contour is largely an EQ matter me-thinks, but the Process is not. Sounds great for bedroom playing. Feb 28, 2012 · The BBE Sonic Maximizer 482i uses an interesting adaptive EQ and adjusts phase relationship of various frequencies. it sounded beter on my stereo that my bass rig. I have also heard alot of people suggesting that a sonic maximizer adds a ton to your tone. Sold it quick to a guitarist who wanted it for his acoustic setup. They’re some of the most popular and longstanding exciter effects out there. This eff The Aphex Systems Model 250 Aural Exciter Type III is a stereo harmonic enhancer and noise gate. But it does this dynamically. Here's a demo of 3 har BBE's Sonic Maximizer has been with us for several years now, earning itself a reputation as one of the sweeter sounding enhancers on the market. The other bass player used a Mesa Big Block and a Mesa 410, with a Sonic Maximizer. Some of the best are: Waves Aphex Vintage Aural Exciter; Waves OneKnob Brighter The original Aphex Aural Exciter, first offered in 1975, came without the Big Bottom circuit, which was added in 1992. Prev Page 5 of 10 Next Prev Page 5 of 10 Next . His tone cut like crazy! He swears it was the Sonic Maximizer, but I have my doubts. It really sounds best when listening to MP3's with headphones. Do you want to know Doctor Mix's top 10 mixing techniques? Join our list here and download the PDF straigh By Bill from Petoskey, MI on June 5, 2018 Music Background: Live Sound, Mobile DJ, Musician. Maybe I May 15, 2022 · Sonic Maximizer - Musicians and studio engineers for years have known that the D82 Sonic Maximizer is the best way to get that professional sound and extra sparkle that is so difficult to capture. Both the same unit, but the 482i has individual controls for both channels. . What it lacks in controllable functionality, it makes up for in pure and undefinable sweetness. The instructions for setting the original Aphex are key to proper exciter use. Dec 20, 2002 · I use the 882i on PA rigs because of the banced outouts. Later revisions of the Aphex Aural Exciter included the Model 104 Type C and Type C2 units. It does have some EQ built in to it, but nonetheless a unique product. The AE tends to sound less harsh to my ears than the SM, but that's personal preference. the big bottom is very similar to the bbe the raggea and hip hop dj's love this item. My ears made some temporary adjustment and everything sounded flat without it. I even hooked it up to my DVD player and it is a real, tangilbe difference! Related: aphex 204 aural exciter optical big bottom aphex 104 aural exciteraphex aural exciter big bottom bbe sonic maximizer peavey kosmos Include description Filter Just FYI, the Aphex Aural Exciter and the BBE Sonic Maximizer are both considered dated and pretty much useless tools these days. They were rented to sound companies and recording studios. Jun 9, 2007 · There's a fundamental difference between Aphex and BBE processes: The Aphex adds extra harmonics by distorting the signal. it's the Aural Exciter 104 by Aphex !I believe this is Aphex's take on BBE's wildly popular and effective sonic maximizer. Aphex is only available on the Aphex player. Dec 22, 2004 · I'd recommend spending an hour or so on both the Aphex and BBE sites so that you know the technical side of what each does, then see if you can get somewhere and play both. Too much of it and your mix will suffer. The hardware BBE Sonic Maximizer is one of the longest established enhancer-type products, but it works very differently from the Aphex Exciter that preceded it and produces noticeably different results. The Aphex Aural Expander, SPL Vitalizer, and Behringer Edison are also all inside. I also use the the BBE Bmax SS preamp and always run the Sonic Maximizer. You mix the results of the processed signal with the unaltered input signal. Dec 14, 2005 · Sequent wrote:I'd like to know the comparisons too. 112dB Redline Preamp. Nov 20, 2018 · I used Aphex Aural C hardware for years- the BBE suite will do everything you need with exactly the same results. At that price it's cheap Sep 17, 2005 · A sonic maximizer is more useful over an entire mix. I have not recorded with it though. Available at Dec 14, 2009 · I also have an Aphex Aural Exiter Type C2 with Big Bottom and I find I tend towards that one more often. Jun 2, 2003 · "My only point in the reply to your post was that lumping the BBE process in with artificial harmonic generators (like the aural exciter) and hi frequency equalizers (like the plethora of enhancers out there) is doing a great injustice to what the Sonic Maximizer actually does, which is correct for a common problem in all electronic gear trying Dec 13, 2012 · BBE's Sonic Maximizer has been with us for several years now, earning itself a reputation as one of the sweeter sounding enhancers on the market. However, with both BBE and Aphex, less is more and using that little of each makes both sound very similar. None of these things can replace simply solving any acoustical problems in your room, getting good speakers, and giving the system good source material to work with. The "Big Bottom" feature does something similar for the low end. So for $39, what the hell. It restores natural brightness and adds deeper and extended low Aug 23, 2007 · It became so popular as to gain credit on albums, citing ‘This record was made with the Aphex Aural Exciter’, while simultaneously gaining an AutoTune-like stigma, for its tall-poppy processing. The Sonic Maximizer is a new one to me- I've never used one, and neither has anyone I know. I have read about them, have a few albums I remember that were recorded using the Aural Exciter, and always was curious. from a musicradar article: BBE Sound’s Sonic Maximizer is a popular alternative to the Aphex Aural Exciter. It is similar to a home stereo "loudness" control in that it boosts the highs and low when the volume is low volume is low. Jan 26, 2007 · Instant EQ in a box. Read the Waves Aphex Vintage Aural Exciter review. Behringer has released another replica of the Aural Exciter, with similar front panel nomenclature, and labelled it the SX3040 Sonic Exciter. Nov 9, 2018 · Today we demonstrate the BBE Sonic Maximizer 822A. Price Drop. Apr 8, 2009 · Aphex Aural Exciters were very expensivea couple grand. Aphex adds controlled harmonic distortion to add the illusion of more treble. We were in the process of recording a jingle and the client wanted it to sound "full, yet empty", "dull, yet exciting" and "sparkling, without the music cutting through the voice-over" - perhaps a job for the Aphex, we thought. The Aphex can make a weak system sound pretty good, and can make a great system sound KILLER. But the plug is rather cool for a exiter plug. Nov 2, 2009 · I do believe I understand somewhat the differences between the BBE Sonic Maximizer and the Aphex Aural Exciter. I'm an advocate for this unit—more than I was for my old Aphex Aural Exciter with Big Bottom (the names still crack me up). I still have it but after I learned how to EQ in a 3-way triamped system I barely use it. You hear the great performance; you don't hear the machine at work. This is accomplished by altering the timing and phase relationship of the harmonics in the recorded signal. Live it adds some of the low end articulation that you can lose when everyone else it playing. It is a digitally based piece of outboard gear and I'm pretty sure it has XLR connections as well as 1/4 inch ones, but I can't remember exactly. Overdo it and you'll pitch it in the bin. possibly the most essential to an amazing sound, next to your tuner and possibly a graphic equalizer or tube amp!. Like Aphex, BBE’s LCD, post: 143536 wrote: I'm looking at both the Aphex 204 and the BBE 482i to add to my collection. The day that the Aphex Exciter arrived would seem, in retrospect, to have an element of great 'good luck' attached to it. In a very simple description of what it does. The Aphex Aural Exciter synthesizes Harmonics, whereas this unit works on "phase" correction. HIghly recommended use of headphones or monitors to appreciate this demonstration:) Hi i'm kiosko 33, independant artist and producer. 0 of 5 on Equipboard. It will split the frequency ranges into bands, and then shift them in the time domain. Unlike the latter, the Sonic Maximizer doesn’t add harmonics, but instead attempts to correct the smear introduced by loudspeakers. Mar 23, 2013 · It's a buncha BS. 99. I played with it awhile and was unimpressed. For individual sounds or entire mixes, the Aural Exciter brings out detail, clarity and imaging that elevates your sound Oct 17, 2014 · I use the exciter in Ozone more often than the BBe Sonic maximizer. it tightens up those cervin vega earth quake speakers. According Mar 28, 2017 · Re: Which BBE Sonic Maximizer for guitar? I've got both the 382i and the 482i. I like mine, but understand, it's a very subtle effect. My memory is that it added even-order harmonics dependent on level and frequency content. 99 $119. The BBE actually time-aligns the signal being put through it. bbe made aural exciters specificlly for instruments (there out of production) check Behringer's labelling of the SX3040 (and, for that matter, the SU9920), boldly claims that the product is the "ultimate stereo sound enhancement processor" — a statement that may be a little misleading, given that the product is very much a low-cost alternative to Aphex's 204 Aural Exciter and Optical Big Bottom, and the Vitalizer range of May 7, 2001 · Not long ago I picked up an Aphex Aural Exciter with the "Big Bottom" feature. Primary function would be on vocals, but I'd also look into using them in production too. PAUL WHITE studio tests the latest incarnation, the 462, which benefits from extensively redesigned circuitry. Apr 4, 2004 · With the Aphex, though, I was in a guitar store where a guy was demo-ing a Marshal TSL 100watt head through a Marshall 4x12, and they were switching the Aural Exciter in and out--and, when hearing the setup with the exciter, it was typical Marshall grind, pretty good sound, but not really my cup-of-tea, when they kicked in the Exciter, I was It all began with the Aphex Systems Aural Exciter in the mid-1970s. Aug 2, 2016 · I have a BBE Sonic Maximizer sitting on a shelf in my basement because it just takes away too much. Keeping in mind that I am not a studio but someone who plays digital music (either CD's or digital files such as mp3, WAV or whatever), what a recording studio might disdain, may not apply to me. It is this alignment that sharpens the sound. The Sonic Maximizer is a dual channel enhancer designed to operate with -10dBu levels. Feb 6, 2007 · I already use the Aphex-set flat it just adds some oomph, but I'm interested in BBE user comments about how they think that unit helps their sound. The only effect I currently use for listening is a Pioneer SR-202 spring reverb unit paired with an SX-680 and some Dynaco A25's. It may improve a marginal bass rig but works better in a marginal PA rack. I've been a user of the bbe hardware for a very very long time and it's a standard thing in my setup. I see Spectralive is currently on Christmas special. But again, feather the effect in and you'll appreciate the difference. Your instruments take on a whole new level of realism - the level they lost when they were first recorded or played through a sound system. Aphex released in 2001 [1] the Model 204 Aural Exciter and Optical Big Bottom, yet another refinement of the original unit. Turn the exciter up until you just clearly hear the effectthen back it down a little. Jan 5, 2014 · FWIW, I used the Aphex Aural Exciter with Big Bottom (talk about marketing!) for awhile. It adds depth and mids (I don't know the exact frequencies), but it sounds fuller. I'll let my 382i go cheap. Aphex Aural Exciter Type C, Effects Processors. The BBE process cleans up the signal and enhances what was lost when the signal was processed by other equipment. The Aphex bass exciter seems to acheive what I want on their website in the demo. But hey, that being said, I've never recorded anything with it. One is a smaller, more compact, powered Harbinger system (One Sub and One Top array) and the other rig is comprised of 2 powered, 15 inch Behringer B1500xp subs, 2 passive, Peavey PR 15 mains along with other, various passive 12-inch monitors, all powered by the Behringer I Sep 8, 2010 · Products like this and the BBE Sonic Maximizer hype the perceived loudness and timbre of the mix and that will tend to rob the system of vital headroom and that makes it easier to clip your mix. Though the effect is similar to an exciter, according to the company the BBE performs a phase alignment to the speaker frequencies. I've heard of people using that for Hi-Fi before and certainly might try it. Harmonic Maximizer - The H82 Harmonic Maximizer increases presence and clarity. Sep 11, 2004 · Have used Aphex Aural and BBE Sonic since the 80's, a little can be just right, too much and your ears can go south. Mar 13, 2019 · While we are talking about Behringer there is a very good emulation of the BBE inside all the X Series Mixers. I have multiple PA systems. It works by applying phase correction to the high frequencies which it does by splitting the sound into 3 bands, crossover frequencies being 150Hz and 1200Hz, and applying delays to the two lower bands. Oct 18, 2007 · bbe is really designed for "enhancing" the over all sound (all freq. Subtle is the key. $59. Haven't heard further on how he's getting along with it. The Aphex Type C2 Aural Exciter was reviewed in the January 1993 edition of Sound On Sound's sister publication Recording Musician, while the most recent incarnation of the BBE Sonic Maximizer, the model 462, was reviewed in the February 1994 issue of Sound On Sound. This is accomplished by altering the timing and phase rel On playback you can use an Aphex Aural Exciter, or BBE Maximizer to bring it back They use this A LOT on the Future Harvest record. I want everything to sound a little more "full". The Aphex isn't the same thing as the Maximizer, but the end result is in the ballpark: gives the appearance of clearer highs and lows. Apr 17, 2012 · Next: Nomad Factory BBE Sonic Maximizer D82. Both were created as "always on" processors to improve the sound of mixes at recording studios and live-sound PA systems, then they found their way into the rigs of guitarists and bassists during the rackmount heydays of the 80s and early 90s. Feb 21, 2009 · Different pedals. The Sonic Maximizer is not an exciter, it's a phase corrector. How they work: First, all processing is done in a side chain. I've used the harmonic maximizer and it duplicates the Aural C perfectly, I sold my hardware C last year and no longer needed it. Applications. Dec 22, 2005 · The BBE is really the only thing on the market that does what it does. Aural Exciter-This signal first hits a HPF. Live? Maybe the rack version, but definitely not the pedal. Paul White studio tests the latest incarnation, the 462, which benefits from extensively redesigned circuitry. Designed to add clarity and sparkle to lifeless recordings, the unit created a buzz […] May 12, 2004 · Also, the BBE Sonic Maximizer has NOTHING in common with the Aphex processors. BBE 422A Sonic Maximizer Rackmount - Made in USA. Only frequencies "above" the HPF setting are processed. Mar 6, 2019 · BBE Sound’s Sonic Maximizer is a popular alternative to the Aural Exciter. And the final result is pure and musical. Used MISC Used Nova Systems NSA-1 Stereo Aphex Exciter Exciter. Most who use exciters overuse them. The BBE messes with the balance of harmonics that are already there. New in Aphex bass exciter or BBE sonic stomp? I am looking to add a fatness and punchy tone to my low end. Hello !Up for sale is an amazing effects unit. I just stuck an old 462 in Tim's DJ rig (Behringer board, Audio Centron power amp, Peavey enclosures) and the results are a vast improvement. Other hardware devices released over the years that have produced a similar sound are: Vitalizer; Sonic Maximizer; Ultrafex; But there are now plenty of fantastic exciter plugins available. Aural Exciter. Hooked it up to my main system, didn't like it. Feb 28, 2008 · BBE splits the signal into two bands and does phase realignment between the passbands. Nov 4, 2003 · Hello everybodyI'm looking to give my recording a little more presence, clarity, and crispness and have been trying to decide between these two--- What do you think is better in general for all types of music--- BBE 882i Sonic Maximizer? or Aphex Model 204 Aural Exciter? Thanks 7 years ago a did an A/B comparison to a BBE (not remember the model) and an Aphex 101 Sonic Maximizer I bought the aphex because it has more control of the effect and it was more cleaner than BBE. If you’re interested in using an exciter, we recommend looking into the Aphex Aural Exciter or the BBE Sonic Maximizer. But I think studio wise it might just muddy the water. Feb 14, 2008 · I tend to use BBE more than Aphex - simply because it is more available on apps than Aphex. I use finger technique primarily, and am typically on the lower end of the bass spectrum. Since the treble frequencies are "sent" first and your ears get them first, they're more present than the bass frequencies. It's like an Aphex Aural Exciter lite. ). Apr 12, 2010 · The BBE Sonic Maximizer works differently. All of them are excellent emulations as good or better than any of the plugins For $300 or less you can get an X12 mixer. For more than 35 years, the Aural Exciter's patented technology has been the audio professional's secret weapon, a powerful way to improve and enhance sonic quality more naturally than with equalization. Jul 16, 2018 · In its physical form, or as a plug-in, the Aphex Aural Exciter is still an in-demand, highly regarded piece of music technology. When you hear a sound through a speaker, the low frequencies are actually delayed a bit due to the nature of how speakers work. Often just on a stem not the whole mix View Post Jan 10, 2008 · Not sure about the Aphex, but I actually use a BBE Sonic Maximizer in my live bass rig. The BBE delays everything but the low frequencies to line up the lows with the highs. When you're young, you buy one and put it in your rack and think, yeah, this kicks ass. It gives you a very defined low end and lots of punch. Still use the Wave plug and the BBE plug to shape lifeless tracks in need of clarity or some bottom. Right now, some Cowan players, older versions of Jet Audio, JVC mobile player and BBE player use the BBE. Dec 15, 2005 · I have a BBE Sonic Maximizer 822 (hardware), it is very cool. Available Used BBE 882i Sonic Maximizer Exciter. This may be apples/oranges but I still want to hear the comments. Jan 30, 2012 · It sits in the mix nice, cuts a bit (but not too much), and is nice and thick. The Aphex Aural Exciter did something similar in a different way. Feb 5, 2019 · Also, the BBE Sonic Maximizer has NOTHING in common with the Aphex processors. For consideration:Sell my Aphex and buy the BBE, or keep the Aphex and add the BBE. See 3 musician reviews, how 3 pros use it, 1 candid photo, and where to get a deal on Aphex Aural Exciter Type C, ranked #647 in Effects Processors and rated 4. As with many effects, less is more. tswsexf qdktgp lqxe tyve hijvpr whadc nqjpo renhuf fdwy hgto